Choose tosses Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit towards Wall Avenue Journal over “malicious” Epstein story
2 min learnWashingtonApr 13, 2026 11:13 PM IST
A federal decide dismissed President Donald Trump’s $10 billion defamation lawsuit towards the Wall Avenue Journal and Rupert Murdoch on Monday over a narrative on his ties to Jeffrey Epstein.
US District Choose Darrin P. Gayles in Florida wrote within the order that Trump had didn’t make the argument that the article was revealed with the intent to be malicious, however gave the president an opportunity to file an amended criticism.
Trump filed the lawsuit in July, following up on a promise to sue the paper virtually instantly after it put a brand new highlight on his well-documented relationship with Epstein by publishing an article that described a sexually suggestive letter that the newspaper stated bore Trump’s signature and was included in a 2003 album compiled for Epstein’s fiftieth birthday.
The letter was subsequently launched publicly by Congress, which subpoenaed the data from Epstein’s property. Trump denied writing it, calling the story “false, malicious, and defamatory.”
Attorneys for the newspaper and Murdoch had requested Gayles to rule that the article’s statements had been true and subsequently couldn’t be defamatory, however the decide wrote that “whether or not President Trump was the creator of the Letter or Epstein’s buddy are questions of reality that can not be decided at this stage of the litigation,” Gayles wrote.
The ruling marks one more blow within the Trump administration’s efforts to handle fallout over its launch of the Epstein recordsdata and the president’s makes an attempt to make use of the authorized system to relax reporting he finds essential of him.
The White Home didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark. A spokesperson for Dow Jones, which publishes the Journal, stated the group was “happy” with the decide’s determination, including, “We stand behind the reliability, rigor and accuracy of The Wall Avenue Journal’s reporting.”
Leave a Reply