“Who on Charlie’s staff betrayed”: Candace Owens raises explosive questions over Ben Shapiro safety updates
Candace Owens has reignited her public feud with Ben Shapiro after claiming that his safety staff acquired updates whereas the late Charlie Kirk was being rushed to a hospital following the September 2025 capturing. In a prolonged X submit printed on July 8, 2026, Owens questioned why communication was going down between the 2 safety groups throughout what she described as Charlie Kirk’s remaining moments. Her feedback sparked debate on-line, drawing responses from supporters, critics, and former Day by day Wire executives. To date, Owens has not supplied proof to help her broader allegations, and several other individuals she talked about have disputed her claims.
What did Candace Owens declare about Ben Shapiro and Charlie Kirk’s safety staff?
The controversy started when Owens shared a submit that opened with: “BREAKING NEWS! Ben Shapiro simply confessed on his present that whereas Charlie was being transported to the hospital and bleeding out to dying, his safety was on the telephone with Charlie’s safety receiving updates.”She then questioned why updates had been allegedly being handed alongside throughout these vital moments, writing: “Somebody clarify to me why throughout the minutes whereas Charlie was DYING within the again seat of the automotive, Charlie’s safety staff was offering updates to Ben Shapiro’s staff moderately than focusing fully on saving Charlie’s life and discovering the killer?”Owens additionally referenced Brian Harpole, a safety staff member who has filed a defamation lawsuit in opposition to her, and instructed there have been unanswered questions on who was speaking with Shapiro’s staff.The submit went additional, with Owens asking, “WHO ON CHARLIE’S SECURITY TEAM BETRAYED HIM IN THIS WAY?!” She additionally questioned why Shapiro had not publicly mentioned the alleged updates earlier.A day later, Owens doubled down on her claims. In a follow-up submit, she wrote: “That is positively explosive. In a dwell present on the day of Charlie’s assassination he pretended as if he was studying info with the remainder us.”
How did Candace Owens reply to Jeremy Boreing and the timeline debate?
Because the dialogue grew, Owens exchanged messages with former Day by day Wire govt Jeremy Boreing. In a single response, she requested: “Was it Jake and/or Robin of FRG that had been on the telephone with Charlie’s safety within the essential minutes that Charlie bled out on the best way to the hospital. It’s a sure or no query, Jeremy.”In one other submit, she challenged Boreing’s rationalization and instructed there have been inconsistencies within the account being offered.Owens additionally targeted on the timing of public studies concerning the capturing. She wrote: “The primary public submit that we are able to discover claiming Charlie Kirk was shot started circulating at 12:32pm.” She then questioned how updates might have reached Shapiro’s safety staff earlier than the information turned broadly public.One other level raised by Owens concerned Shapiro’s present manufacturing course of. She said: “So that everybody understands, Ben Shapiro’s present is just not recorded dwell. He pre-records, after which the present is distributed by way of enhancing and authorized. He didn’t misspeak.”The talk stems from feedback made by Shapiro on his present, the place he stated his safety staff had been in touch with Charlie Kirk’s safety staff whereas Kirk was being transported to a hospital. In keeping with Shapiro, the communication helped present details about the state of affairs and safety issues.Critics of Owens argue that such coordination may very well be a standard safety response, particularly amid fears that different conservative figures may also be in danger. Boreing has publicly defended the communication as normal safety coordination and accused Owens of misrepresenting occasions.As of July 8, 2026, Owens continues to argue that the communication raises critical questions, whereas her critics keep that she is drawing conclusions with out proof.
